Comparison
Matzen vs Pain azyme
Overall, Matzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Matzen | Pain azyme |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 362 kcal | 377 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 2.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 3.5 g |
| Protein | 11.3 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Matzen has 33% less fat (1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Matzen has 59% less sugar (1.2 g vs 2.9 g).
- Pain azyme is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Matzen
Farina di frumento, acqua
Pain azyme
Farine de _blé_, eau.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Matzen or Pain azyme?
Overall, Matzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Matzen has fewer calories: 362 kcal versus 377 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Matzen has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 2.9 g per 100 g.