Comparison

Mark-Klößchen vs Lebernockerl

Overall, Mark-Klößchen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMark-KlößchenLebernockerl
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 265 kcal 491 kcal
Fat 15 g 25.4 g
Saturated fat 6.8 g 14.5 g
Sugars 0.5 g 15.1 g
Salt 2.5 g 1.6 g
Fiber — 3 g
Protein 6.9 g 18.4 g
Additives00
AllergensEggs, WeizermehlEggs, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Mark-Klößchen has 46% fewer calories (265 kcal vs 491 kcal).
  • Mark-Klößchen has 41% less fat (15 g vs 25.4 g).
  • Mark-Klößchen has 53% less saturated fat (6.8 g vs 14.5 g).
  • Mark-Klößchen has 97% less sugar (0.5 g vs 15.1 g).
  • Lebernockerl has 36% less salt (1.6 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Lebernockerl has 63% more protein (18.4 g vs 6.9 g).
  • Mark-Klößchen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Mark-Klößchen lists: Weizermehl.
  • Only Lebernockerl lists: Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Mark-Klößchen

Paniermehl (_Weizermehl_, Hefe, Salz), Vollei, Wasser, Rindermarkfett 15%, Salz, Kartoffelstärke, Gewürze, Rinderfond, Petersilie,

Lebernockerl

Rinderleber 24 %, Semmelbrösel (Weizenmehl, Hefe, Salz), pflanzliches Fett (Palm), Milchzucker, Eiweißpulver, Weizengrieß, Weizenmehl, Zwiebeln, Volleipulver, Gewürze, Salz, Knoblauch, Petersilie.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mark-Klößchen or Lebernockerl?

Overall, Mark-Klößchen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mark-Klößchen has fewer calories: 265 kcal versus 491 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mark-Klößchen has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 15.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons