Mark-Klößchen vs Backerbsen
Overall, Mark-Klößchen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mark-Klößchen | Backerbsen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 265 kcal | 523 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.8 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 3.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 6.9 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Weizermehl | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mark-Klößchen has 49% fewer calories (265 kcal vs 523 kcal).
- Mark-Klößchen has 52% less fat (15 g vs 31 g).
- Mark-Klößchen has 57% less saturated fat (6.8 g vs 16 g).
- Mark-Klößchen has 89% less sugar (0.5 g vs 4.5 g).
- Mark-Klößchen has 24% less salt (2.5 g vs 3.3 g).
- Backerbsen has 14% more protein (8 g vs 6.9 g).
- Mark-Klößchen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Mark-Klößchen lists: Eggs, Weizermehl.
- Only Backerbsen lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Mark-Klößchen
Paniermehl (_Weizermehl_, Hefe, Salz), Vollei, Wasser, Rindermarkfett 15%, Salz, Kartoffelstärke, Gewürze, Rinderfond, Petersilie,
Backerbsen
Weizenmehl, Palmöl, Süßmolkenpulver, Maismehl, Speisesalz, Backtriebmittel (Diphosphate, Natriumcarbonate), Maisstärke, Volleipulver von Eiern aus Bodenhaltung
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mark-Klößchen or Backerbsen?
Overall, Mark-Klößchen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mark-Klößchen has fewer calories: 265 kcal versus 523 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mark-Klößchen has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.