Backerbsen vs Markklößchen
Overall, Markklößchen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Backerbsen | Markklößchen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 523 kcal | 269 kcal |
| Fat | 31 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 16 g | 7.8 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 3.3 g | 2.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 8 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Markklößchen has 49% fewer calories (269 kcal vs 523 kcal).
- Markklößchen has 45% less fat (17 g vs 31 g).
- Markklößchen has 51% less saturated fat (7.8 g vs 16 g).
- Markklößchen has 89% less sugar (0.5 g vs 4.5 g).
- Markklößchen has 36% less salt (2.1 g vs 3.3 g).
- Backerbsen has 100% more fiber (2.2 g vs 0 g).
- Backerbsen has 13% more protein (8 g vs 7 g).
- Markklößchen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Backerbsen lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Backerbsen
Weizenmehl, Palmöl, Süßmolkenpulver, Maismehl, Speisesalz, Backtriebmittel (Diphosphate, Natriumcarbonate), Maisstärke, Volleipulver von Eiern aus Bodenhaltung
Markklößchen
Paniermehl, _Weizenmehl_, Hefe, Rinderknochenmarkfett 15%, Jodsalz, Speisesalz, Zucker, Gewürze, Gewürzextrakte, Petersilie
FAQ
Which is healthier: Backerbsen or Markklößchen?
Overall, Markklößchen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Markklößchen has fewer calories: 269 kcal versus 523 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Markklößchen has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.