Markklößchen vs Backerbsen
Overall, Markklößchen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Markklößchen | Backerbsen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 269 kcal | 523 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.8 g | 16.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 3.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 7 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Eggs, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Markklößchen has 49% fewer calories (269 kcal vs 523 kcal).
- Markklößchen has 45% less fat (17 g vs 31 g).
- Markklößchen has 52% less saturated fat (7.8 g vs 16.3 g).
- Markklößchen has 89% less sugar (0.5 g vs 4.5 g).
- Markklößchen has 36% less salt (2.1 g vs 3.3 g).
- Backerbsen has 13% more protein (8 g vs 7 g).
- Markklößchen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Backerbsen lists: Eggs, Milk.
Ingredients
Markklößchen
Paniermehl, _Weizenmehl_, Hefe, Rinderknochenmarkfett 15%, Jodsalz, Speisesalz, Zucker, Gewürze, Gewürzextrakte, Petersilie
Backerbsen
Weizenmehl, Palmöl, Süßmolkenpulver, Maismehl, Speisesalz, Backtriebmittel: Diphosphate, Natriumcarbonate; Stärke, Hühnervolleipulver.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Markklößchen or Backerbsen?
Overall, Markklößchen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Markklößchen has fewer calories: 269 kcal versus 523 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Markklößchen has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.