Lebernockerl vs Backerbsen
Overall, Lebernockerl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lebernockerl | Backerbsen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 491 kcal | 523 kcal |
| Fat | 25.4 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 14.5 g | 16.3 g |
| Sugars | 15.1 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 3.3 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | — |
| Protein | 18.4 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk | Eggs, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lebernockerl has 18% less fat (25.4 g vs 31 g).
- Lebernockerl has 11% less saturated fat (14.5 g vs 16.3 g).
- Backerbsen has 70% less sugar (4.5 g vs 15.1 g).
- Lebernockerl has 52% less salt (1.6 g vs 3.3 g).
- Lebernockerl has 57% more protein (18.4 g vs 8 g).
Ingredients
Lebernockerl
Rinderleber 24 %, Semmelbrösel (Weizenmehl, Hefe, Salz), pflanzliches Fett (Palm), Milchzucker, Eiweißpulver, Weizengrieß, Weizenmehl, Zwiebeln, Volleipulver, Gewürze, Salz, Knoblauch, Petersilie.
Backerbsen
Weizenmehl, Palmöl, Süßmolkenpulver, Maismehl, Speisesalz, Backtriebmittel: Diphosphate, Natriumcarbonate; Stärke, Hühnervolleipulver.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lebernockerl or Backerbsen?
Overall, Lebernockerl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lebernockerl has fewer calories: 491 kcal versus 523 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Backerbsen has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 15.1 g per 100 g.