Lebernockerl vs Backerbsen
Overall, Lebernockerl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lebernockerl | Backerbsen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 491 kcal | 523 kcal |
| Fat | 25.4 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 14.5 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 15.1 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 3.3 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 18.4 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lebernockerl has 18% less fat (25.4 g vs 31 g).
- Backerbsen has 70% less sugar (4.5 g vs 15.1 g).
- Lebernockerl has 52% less salt (1.6 g vs 3.3 g).
- Lebernockerl has 27% more fiber (3 g vs 2.2 g).
- Lebernockerl has 57% more protein (18.4 g vs 8 g).
- Only Lebernockerl lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Lebernockerl
Rinderleber 24 %, Semmelbrösel (Weizenmehl, Hefe, Salz), pflanzliches Fett (Palm), Milchzucker, Eiweißpulver, Weizengrieß, Weizenmehl, Zwiebeln, Volleipulver, Gewürze, Salz, Knoblauch, Petersilie.
Backerbsen
Weizenmehl, Palmöl, Süßmolkenpulver, Maismehl, Speisesalz, Backtriebmittel (Diphosphate, Natriumcarbonate), Maisstärke, Volleipulver von Eiern aus Bodenhaltung
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lebernockerl or Backerbsen?
Overall, Lebernockerl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lebernockerl has fewer calories: 491 kcal versus 523 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Backerbsen has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 15.1 g per 100 g.