Comparison

Mango-Fruchtsauce vs Rote Linsen Burger

Overall, Mango-Fruchtsauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMango-FruchtsauceRote Linsen Burger
Nutri-Score — a
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 99 kcal 170 kcal
Fat 0.9 g 4.9 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.6 g
Sugars 16.4 g 1.8 g
Salt 0 g 1 g
Fiber 1.4 g 9.6 g
Protein 0.5 g 9.1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Mango-Fruchtsauce has 42% fewer calories (99 kcal vs 170 kcal).
  • Mango-Fruchtsauce has 82% less fat (0.9 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Mango-Fruchtsauce has 97% less saturated fat (0 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Rote Linsen Burger has 89% less sugar (1.8 g vs 16.4 g).
  • Mango-Fruchtsauce has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1 g).
  • Rote Linsen Burger has 86% more fiber (9.6 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Rote Linsen Burger has 95% more protein (9.1 g vs 0.5 g).

Ingredients

Mango-Fruchtsauce

Mangopüree* 77%, Wasser, Agavendicksaft*, Rohrohrzucker*, Apfelsaftkonzentrat*, Verdickungsmittel: Johannisbrotkernmehl*, Zitronensaftkonzentrat* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft.

Rote Linsen Burger

Rote Linsen* 60 %, Reisvollkornmehl*, Kartoffeln*, Karotten*, Zucchini*, Meersalz, Sonnenblumenöl*, Paprika*, Lauch*, Petersilie*, Pfeffer*, Kurkuma*, Kreuzkümmel*, Paprikapulver*, Fenchelsamen*, Kümmel*, Koriandersamen* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft Kann Spuren von Gluten, Ei, Soja, Milch, Sellerie und Senf enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mango-Fruchtsauce or Rote Linsen Burger?

Overall, Mango-Fruchtsauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mango-Fruchtsauce has fewer calories: 99 kcal versus 170 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rote Linsen Burger has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 16.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons