Comparison

Mackerel fillets in tomato sauce vs Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate

Overall, Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMackerel fillets in tomato s...Filetes de Caballa del Sur e...
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group — 3
Calories 168 kcal 141 kcal
Fat 11.5 g 6.4 g
Saturated fat 2.7 g 1.7 g
Sugars 1.9 g 0.7 g
Salt 1 g 1 g
Fiber — 0.7 g
Protein 13.5 g 17.9 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has 16% fewer calories (141 kcal vs 168 kcal).
  • Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has 44% less fat (6.4 g vs 11.5 g).
  • Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has 37% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has 63% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has 25% more protein (17.9 g vs 13.5 g).
  • Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Mackerel fillets in tomato sauce

Not available.

Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate

_Caballa del sur_ (_pescado_) (65%), salsa de tomate (34%) (agua, concentrado de tomate, aceite de girasol) y sal.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mackerel fillets in tomato sauce or Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate?

Overall, Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has fewer calories: 141 kcal versus 168 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons