Comparison
Luomu suomalainen ruishiutale vs Copos de Centeno
Overall, Luomu suomalainen ruishiutale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Luomu suomalainen ruishiutal... | Copos de Centeno |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 340 kcal | 333 kcal |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 18 g | 13 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Luomu suomalainen ruishiutale has 28% more fiber (18 g vs 13 g).
Ingredients
Luomu suomalainen ruishiutale
_Täysjyväruis_
Copos de Centeno
Copos de Centeno* ( de Producción Biológica)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Luomu suomalainen ruishiutale or Copos de Centeno?
Overall, Luomu suomalainen ruishiutale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Copos de Centeno has fewer calories: 333 kcal versus 340 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Copos de Centeno has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Roggenflocken Vollkorn vs Copos de Centeno
Organic rye flakes vs Copos de Centeno
Platki zytnie vs Copos de Centeno
Ekologiczne płatki żytni... vs Luomu suomalainen ruishi...
Luomu suomalainen ruishi... vs Fiocchi di segale
Rye cocoa flakes MILZU!... vs Copos de Centeno
Ekologiczne płatki żytni... vs Copos de Centeno
Fiocchi di segale vs Copos de Centeno