Lotus Biscoff Speculoos pasta creamy vs Squeezer Speculoos
Overall, Lotus Biscoff Speculoos pasta creamy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Lotus Biscoff Speculoos pasta creamy
Squeezer Speculoos
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lotus Biscoff Speculoos past... | Squeezer Speculoos |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 584 kcal | 591 kcal |
| Fat | 38.1 g | 39 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.6 g | 5.1 g |
| Sugars | 36.8 g | 44 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 2.9 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Squeezer Speculoos has 33% less saturated fat (5.1 g vs 7.6 g).
- Lotus Biscoff Speculoos pasta creamy has 16% less sugar (36.8 g vs 44 g).
- Lotus Biscoff Speculoos pasta creamy has 38% more fiber (0.8 g vs 0.5 g).
- Lotus Biscoff Speculoos pasta creamy has 31% more protein (2.9 g vs 2 g).
- Only Lotus Biscoff Speculoos pasta creamy lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Lotus Biscoff Speculoos pasta creamy
Caramelised biscuits 58% (wheat flour, sugar, vegetable oils (palm, rapeseed), candy sugar syrup, raising agent (sodium hydrogen carbonate), soya flour, salt, cinnamon), rapeseed oil, sugar, emulsifier (soya lecithin), acid (citric acid)
Squeezer Speculoos
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lotus Biscoff Speculoos pasta creamy or Squeezer Speculoos?
Overall, Lotus Biscoff Speculoos pasta creamy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lotus Biscoff Speculoos pasta creamy has fewer calories: 584 kcal versus 591 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lotus Biscoff Speculoos pasta creamy has less sugar: 36.8 g versus 44 g per 100 g.