Long Fish vs Fischburger
Overall, Fischburger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Long Fish | Fischburger |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 554 kcal | 151 kcal |
| Fat | 31.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 4.1 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 24.1 g | 11.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery, Crustaceans, Eggs, Fish, Gluten, Milk | Fish, Gluten, Milk, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fischburger has 73% fewer calories (151 kcal vs 554 kcal).
- Fischburger has 96% less fat (1.2 g vs 31.2 g).
- Fischburger has 88% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 2.4 g).
- Fischburger has 46% less sugar (2.2 g vs 4.1 g).
- Fischburger has 31% less salt (1.3 g vs 2 g).
- Long Fish has 51% more protein (24.1 g vs 11.9 g).
- Fischburger has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Long Fish lists: Celery, Crustaceans, Eggs.
- Only Fischburger lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Long Fish
Pain aux céréales, salade, fromage, sauce tartare, préparation panée de poisson blanc Allergènes présents : _lait_, _crustaces_, _celeri_, _gluten_, _oeuf_, _poisson_
Fischburger
Fisch* 52 %, Weizenmehl, Wasser, Kartoffelflocken, Kräu - ter, Zwiebeln, Porree, Speisesalz, Gewürze (enthalten Senf), Branntweinessig, Laktose, Hefe, Zucker
FAQ
Which is healthier: Long Fish or Fischburger?
Overall, Fischburger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fischburger has fewer calories: 151 kcal versus 554 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fischburger has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.