Lomo vs Longaniza Linguica
Overall, Lomo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lomo | Longaniza Linguica |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 199 kcal | 505 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 41 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 3 g | 3.7 g |
| Protein | 38 g | 32 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Pork |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lomo has 61% fewer calories (199 kcal vs 505 kcal).
- Lomo has 88% less fat (5 g vs 41 g).
- Lomo has 88% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 16 g).
- Lomo has 19% less salt (3 g vs 3.7 g).
- Lomo has 16% more protein (38 g vs 32 g).
- Lomo has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Longaniza Linguica lists: Pork.
Ingredients
Lomo
Lomo de cerdo, sal, pimentones, dextrosa, ajo, antioxidantes (E-331, E-301), aromas y conservadores (E-250 E-252)
Longaniza Linguica
pork, bacon, salt, dextrin, dextrose, spices, flavorings, maltodextrin, antioxidant (e-301) and preservative (e-250), edible collagen wrap, packaged in protective atmosphere,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lomo or Longaniza Linguica?
Overall, Lomo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lomo has fewer calories: 199 kcal versus 505 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lomo has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.