Comparison

Lencserudacskák, chilis vs Protein kikker erwten wafels

Overall, Protein kikker erwten wafels has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLencserudacskák, chilisProtein kikker erwten wafels
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group — 1
Calories 432 kcal 27 kcal
Fat 14 g 0.3 g
Saturated fat 1.8 g 0.1 g
Sugars 5.5 g 0.2 g
Salt 1.5 g 0 g
Fiber — 0.6 g
Protein 15 g 1.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Protein kikker erwten wafels has 94% fewer calories (27 kcal vs 432 kcal).
  • Protein kikker erwten wafels has 98% less fat (0.3 g vs 14 g).
  • Protein kikker erwten wafels has 94% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Protein kikker erwten wafels has 96% less sugar (0.2 g vs 5.5 g).
  • Protein kikker erwten wafels has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Lencserudacskák, chilis has 91% more protein (15 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Protein kikker erwten wafels has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Lencserudacskák, chilis

préparation de protéine de soja 95% (eau, pousses de sojal, huile de tourne - soli, fumée), extrait de malt d'orgel, sel marin, épicel. llngrédient issu de l'agriculture biologique. A conserver à +8 oc maximum et à

Protein kikker erwten wafels

Kikkererwtenmeel* 60%, rijstmeel* 40%.* Ingrediënten afkomstig van biologische landbouw. Kan sporen bevatten van soja.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lencserudacskák, chilis or Protein kikker erwten wafels?

Overall, Protein kikker erwten wafels has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Protein kikker erwten wafels has fewer calories: 27 kcal versus 432 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Protein kikker erwten wafels has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 5.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons