Laugen Brezen vs Mini Brezeln
Overall, Laugen Brezen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Laugen Brezen | Mini Brezeln |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 213 kcal | 398 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 4.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 1.8 g |
| Sugars | 2.6 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 3.7 g |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 4.3 g |
| Protein | 8.1 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 4 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Laugen Brezen has 46% fewer calories (213 kcal vs 398 kcal).
- Laugen Brezen has 76% less fat (1 g vs 4.1 g).
- Laugen Brezen has 89% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 1.8 g).
- Mini Brezeln has 15% less sugar (2.2 g vs 2.6 g).
- Laugen Brezen has 65% less salt (1.3 g vs 3.7 g).
- Mini Brezeln has 47% more fiber (4.3 g vs 2.3 g).
- Mini Brezeln has 26% more protein (11 g vs 8.1 g).
- Laugen Brezen has the better Nutri-Score.
- Mini Brezeln is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Laugen Brezen lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Laugen Brezen
Weizenmehl, Wasser, Hefe, Salz, Weizenmalzmehl, Dextrose, Emulgatoren: Mono - und Diglyceride von Speisefettsäuren, Lecithine (Soja); Stabilisator: Guarkernmehl; Brezenlauge (Wasser, Säureregulator: Natriumhydroxid). Beipack: Brezelsalz.
Mini Brezeln
Weizenmehl, Meersalz 2,7%, Palmöl, Säureregulator (Natriumhydroxid). Kann Spuren von Sesam, Milch und Soja enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Laugen Brezen or Mini Brezeln?
Overall, Laugen Brezen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Laugen Brezen has fewer calories: 213 kcal versus 398 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mini Brezeln has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 2.6 g per 100 g.