Comparison

Lachsforelle vs Pstrąg łososiowy wędzony w plastrach

Overall, Lachsforelle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLachsforellePstrąg łososiowy wędzony w p...
Nutri-Score a e
NOVA group — 3
Calories 155 kcal 198 kcal
Fat 9.3 g 13 g
Saturated fat 2.1 g 2.5 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 0.1 g 3.2 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 18 g 20 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lachsforelle has 22% fewer calories (155 kcal vs 198 kcal).
  • Lachsforelle has 28% less fat (9.3 g vs 13 g).
  • Lachsforelle has 16% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Pstrąg łososiowy wędzony w plastrach has no sugar, while Lachsforelle has 0.5 g.
  • Lachsforelle has 98% less salt (0.1 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Pstrąg łososiowy wędzony w plastrach has 10% more protein (20 g vs 18 g).
  • Lachsforelle has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Pstrąg łososiowy wędzony w plastrach lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Lachsforelle

Not available.

Pstrąg łososiowy wędzony w plastrach

Pstrąg tęczowy (Oncorhynchus mykiss), sól.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lachsforelle or Pstrąg łososiowy wędzony w plastrach?

Overall, Lachsforelle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lachsforelle has fewer calories: 155 kcal versus 198 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pstrąg łososiowy wędzony w plastrach has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons