Comparison

Lachsforelle vs Lachsforelle

Overall, Lachsforelle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLachsforelleLachsforelle
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group — —
Calories 155 kcal 143 kcal
Fat 9.3 g 7 g
Saturated fat 2.1 g 1.3 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 0.1 g 2.9 g
Protein 18 g 20 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lachsforelle has 25% less fat (7 g vs 9.3 g).
  • Lachsforelle has 38% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Lachsforelle has no sugar, while Lachsforelle has 0.5 g.
  • Lachsforelle has 98% less salt (0.1 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Lachsforelle has 10% more protein (20 g vs 18 g).
  • Lachsforelle has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Lachsforelle

Not available.

Lachsforelle

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lachsforelle or Lachsforelle?

Overall, Lachsforelle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lachsforelle has fewer calories: 143 kcal versus 155 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lachsforelle has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons