Lachsforelle vs Lachsforelle
Overall, Lachsforelle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lachsforelle | Lachsforelle |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 155 kcal | 143 kcal |
| Fat | 9.3 g | 7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lachsforelle has 25% less fat (7 g vs 9.3 g).
- Lachsforelle has 38% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.1 g).
- Lachsforelle has no sugar, while Lachsforelle has 0.5 g.
- Lachsforelle has 98% less salt (0.1 g vs 2.9 g).
- Lachsforelle has 10% more protein (20 g vs 18 g).
- Lachsforelle has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Lachsforelle
Not available.
Lachsforelle
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lachsforelle or Lachsforelle?
Overall, Lachsforelle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lachsforelle has fewer calories: 143 kcal versus 155 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lachsforelle has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.