Comparison

Lachsforelle vs Pstrąg łososiowy wędzony w plastrach

Overall, Lachsforelle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLachsforellePstrąg łososiowy wędzony w p...
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group — 3
Calories 143 kcal 198 kcal
Fat 7 g 13 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 2.5 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 2.9 g 3.2 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 20 g 20 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lachsforelle has 28% fewer calories (143 kcal vs 198 kcal).
  • Lachsforelle has 46% less fat (7 g vs 13 g).
  • Lachsforelle has 48% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Lachsforelle has 11% less salt (2.9 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Lachsforelle has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Pstrąg łososiowy wędzony w plastrach lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Lachsforelle

Not available.

Pstrąg łososiowy wędzony w plastrach

Pstrąg tęczowy (Oncorhynchus mykiss), sól.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lachsforelle or Pstrąg łososiowy wędzony w plastrach?

Overall, Lachsforelle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lachsforelle has fewer calories: 143 kcal versus 198 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lachsforelle has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons