Comparison
Lachsforelle vs Pstrąg łososiowy wędzony w plastrach
Overall, Lachsforelle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lachsforelle | Pstrąg łososiowy wędzony w p... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 148 kcal | 198 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 2.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.3 g | 3.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lachsforelle has 25% fewer calories (148 kcal vs 198 kcal).
- Lachsforelle has 38% less fat (8 g vs 13 g).
- Lachsforelle has 44% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 2.5 g).
- Lachsforelle has 29% less salt (2.3 g vs 3.2 g).
- Lachsforelle has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pstrąg łososiowy wędzony w plastrach lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Lachsforelle
Not available.
Pstrąg łososiowy wędzony w plastrach
Pstrąg tęczowy (Oncorhynchus mykiss), sól.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lachsforelle or Pstrąg łososiowy wędzony w plastrach?
Overall, Lachsforelle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lachsforelle has fewer calories: 148 kcal versus 198 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lachsforelle has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Lachsforelle vs Pstrąg łososiowy wędzony...
Lachsforelle vs Lachsforelle
Frisches Lachsforellen-F... vs Pstrąg łososiowy wędzony...
Frisches Lachsforellen-F... vs Lachsforelle
Lachsforelle vs Pstrąg łososiowy wędzony...
Świeży pstrąg tęczowy ło... vs Pstrąg łososiowy wędzony...
Regenbogenforellen Filet... vs Pstrąg łososiowy wędzony...
Lachsforelle vs Lachsforelle