Comparison

Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn vs Pipas de calabaza

Overall, Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKürbiskerne aus UngarnPipas de calabaza
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 1 3
Calories 603 kcal 479 kcal
Fat 48 g 34 g
Saturated fat 9 g 6.8 g
Sugars 0.9 g 1.7 g
Salt 0.1 g 10.4 g
Fiber 8.9 g 18 g
Protein 36 g 23 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pipas de calabaza has 21% fewer calories (479 kcal vs 603 kcal).
  • Pipas de calabaza has 29% less fat (34 g vs 48 g).
  • Pipas de calabaza has 24% less saturated fat (6.8 g vs 9 g).
  • Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has 47% less sugar (0.9 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has 99% less salt (0.1 g vs 10.4 g).
  • Pipas de calabaza has 51% more fiber (18 g vs 8.9 g).
  • Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has 36% more protein (36 g vs 23 g).
  • Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Pipas de calabaza lists: None.

Ingredients

Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn

Kürbiskerne

Pipas de calabaza

Pipas de calabaza 84%, sal 15%, harina de arroz.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn or Pipas de calabaza?

Overall, Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pipas de calabaza has fewer calories: 479 kcal versus 603 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons