Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn vs Pipas de calabaza
Overall, Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn | Pipas de calabaza |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 603 kcal | 479 kcal |
| Fat | 48 g | 34 g |
| Saturated fat | 9 g | 6.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 10.4 g |
| Fiber | 8.9 g | 18 g |
| Protein | 36 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipas de calabaza has 21% fewer calories (479 kcal vs 603 kcal).
- Pipas de calabaza has 29% less fat (34 g vs 48 g).
- Pipas de calabaza has 24% less saturated fat (6.8 g vs 9 g).
- Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has 47% less sugar (0.9 g vs 1.7 g).
- Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has 99% less salt (0.1 g vs 10.4 g).
- Pipas de calabaza has 51% more fiber (18 g vs 8.9 g).
- Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has 36% more protein (36 g vs 23 g).
- Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has the better Nutri-Score.
- Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Pipas de calabaza lists: None.
Ingredients
Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn
Kürbiskerne
Pipas de calabaza
Pipas de calabaza 84%, sal 15%, harina de arroz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn or Pipas de calabaza?
Overall, Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pipas de calabaza has fewer calories: 479 kcal versus 603 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.