Comparison

Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn vs Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal

Overall, Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKürbiskerne aus UngarnPipa de calabaza tostada con...
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 603 kcal 624 kcal
Fat 48 g 52 g
Saturated fat 9 g 11 g
Sugars 0.9 g 2.5 g
Salt 0.1 g 1.5 g
Fiber 8.9 g 8 g
Protein 36 g 34 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has 18% less saturated fat (9 g vs 11 g).
  • Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has 64% less sugar (0.9 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has 93% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has 10% more fiber (8.9 g vs 8 g).
  • Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn

Kürbiskerne

Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal

Pipas de calabaza, sal, espesante (goma guar)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn or Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal?

Overall, Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has fewer calories: 603 kcal versus 624 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons