Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn vs Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal
Overall, Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn
Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn | Pipa de calabaza tostada con... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 603 kcal | 624 kcal |
| Fat | 48 g | 52 g |
| Saturated fat | 9 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 8.9 g | 8 g |
| Protein | 36 g | 34 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has 18% less saturated fat (9 g vs 11 g).
- Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has 64% less sugar (0.9 g vs 2.5 g).
- Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has 93% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has 10% more fiber (8.9 g vs 8 g).
- Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has the better Nutri-Score.
- Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn
Kürbiskerne
Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal
Pipas de calabaza, sal, espesante (goma guar)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn or Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal?
Overall, Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has fewer calories: 603 kcal versus 624 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kürbiskerne aus Ungarn has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.