Kokos cuisine vs Cooking COCO 18%
Overall, Kokos cuisine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kokos cuisine | Cooking COCO 18% |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 130 kcal | 185 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kokos cuisine has 30% fewer calories (130 kcal vs 185 kcal).
- Kokos cuisine has 28% less fat (13 g vs 18 g).
- Kokos cuisine has 25% less saturated fat (12 g vs 16 g).
- Cooking COCO 18% has 71% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1.4 g).
Ingredients
Kokos cuisine
Kokosmilch* 70% (Kokosextrakt* 60%, Wasser), Wasser, Verdickungsmittel: Guarkernmehl*, Johannisbrotkernmehl*, Meersalz *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft. Kann Spuren von Soja, Mandel und Nüssen enthalten.
Cooking COCO 18%
ekstrakt z kokosa 79,1 % (woda, ekstrakt miąższu z kokosa), tłuszcz kokosowy 15,6 %, mąka tapiokowa, białka bobu, substancja zagęszczająca: pektyny, wegańskie kultury bakterii.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kokos cuisine or Cooking COCO 18%?
Overall, Kokos cuisine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kokos cuisine has fewer calories: 130 kcal versus 185 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cooking COCO 18% has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.