Knorr pasta snack pot carbonara vs Makaron Carbonara
Overall, Knorr pasta snack pot carbonara has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Knorr pasta snack pot carbon... | Makaron Carbonara |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 2 | 4 |
| Calories | 98 kcal | 98 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Celery, Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Mustard, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Knorr pasta snack pot carbonara is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Makaron Carbonara lists: Celery, Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Mustard, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Knorr pasta snack pot carbonara
Not available.
Makaron Carbonara
Makaron (55%) (semolina z PSZENICY durum, mąka PSZENNA), skrobia, odtłuszczone MLEKO w proszku, SER topiony (6%) [w tym: typu Blue, dojrzewający, Crescenza; preparat serwatkowy (MLEKO)], olej słonecznikowy, ŚMIETANA (3%), wędzony boczek (2%) (boczek, sól), syrop glukozowy, aromaty (w tym MLEKO), LAKTOZA, sól jodowana, mineralna sól potasowa, cukier, szczypiorek (0,8%), sól, wędzona słonina (0,4%) (słonina, sól), ekstrakt drożdżowy, białka MLEKA, cebula, kurkuma. _Może zawiera gorczycę, jaja, seler, soję i inne zboża zawierające gluten._
FAQ
Which is healthier: Knorr pasta snack pot carbonara or Makaron Carbonara?
Overall, Knorr pasta snack pot carbonara has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Makaron Carbonara has fewer calories: 98 kcal versus 98 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Knorr pasta snack pot carbonara has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.