Kim-Chi vs Rode kool met appel
Overall, Rode kool met appel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kim-Chi | Rode kool met appel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 15 kcal | 42 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.6 g | 8 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kim-Chi has 64% fewer calories (15 kcal vs 42 kcal).
- Kim-Chi has 68% less sugar (2.6 g vs 8 g).
- Rode kool met appel has 79% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.9 g).
- Rode kool met appel has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kim-Chi
Chinese cabbage, chill, garli,sat (RU) Kапуста по-корейски "Ким-чи"оригинал. Состав: китайская капуста, перец чеснок, соль, кориандр, консервант: сорбат калия. При температуре + 2"СдО -+/С фи ГОдноСТи до: СМ. обод. Koriander, Konservierungsstoff: Kaliumsorbat. Bei +2°C bis +7°C mindestens haltbar bis: siehe Rand. preferentemente antes del: ver margen. veja margem. (Hergestellt in
Rode kool met appel
59% rode kool, water, 7% appel, suiker, azijn, gemodificeerd maïszetmeel, zout.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kim-Chi or Rode kool met appel?
Overall, Rode kool met appel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kim-Chi has fewer calories: 15 kcal versus 42 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kim-Chi has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 8 g per 100 g.