Kim-Chi vs Surkål
Overall, Kim-Chi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kim-Chi | Surkål |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 15 kcal | 45 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.6 g | 9.3 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kim-Chi has 67% fewer calories (15 kcal vs 45 kcal).
- Kim-Chi has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Kim-Chi has 72% less sugar (2.6 g vs 9.3 g).
- Surkål has 42% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.9 g).
- Surkål has 40% more protein (1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Only Surkål lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Kim-Chi
Chinese cabbage, chill, garli,sat (RU) Kапуста по-корейски "Ким-чи"оригинал. Состав: китайская капуста, перец чеснок, соль, кориандр, консервант: сорбат калия. При температуре + 2"СдО -+/С фи ГОдноСТи до: СМ. обод. Koriander, Konservierungsstoff: Kaliumsorbat. Bei +2°C bis +7°C mindestens haltbar bis: siehe Rand. preferentemente antes del: ver margen. veja margem. (Hergestellt in
Surkål
strimlet hodekål 72 %, lake (vann, sukker, eddik, salt, konserveringsmiddel (natriumbenzoat), fortykningsmiddel (guarkjernemel), krydder), karve.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kim-Chi or Surkål?
Overall, Kim-Chi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kim-Chi has fewer calories: 15 kcal versus 45 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kim-Chi has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 9.3 g per 100 g.