Kim-Chi vs Crunchy Red Cabbage
Overall, Kim-Chi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kim-Chi | Crunchy Red Cabbage |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 15 kcal | 29 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.6 g | 4.9 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 2.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kim-Chi has 48% fewer calories (15 kcal vs 29 kcal).
- Kim-Chi has 47% less sugar (2.6 g vs 4.9 g).
- Kim-Chi has 22% less salt (1.9 g vs 2.4 g).
Ingredients
Kim-Chi
Chinese cabbage, chill, garli,sat (RU) Kапуста по-корейски "Ким-чи"оригинал. Состав: китайская капуста, перец чеснок, соль, кориандр, консервант: сорбат калия. При температуре + 2"СдО -+/С фи ГОдноСТи до: СМ. обод. Koriander, Konservierungsstoff: Kaliumsorbat. Bei +2°C bis +7°C mindestens haltbar bis: siehe Rand. preferentemente antes del: ver margen. veja margem. (Hergestellt in
Crunchy Red Cabbage
Red Cabbage, Water, Spirit Vinegar, Sugar, Salt, Firming Agent (Calcium Acetate), Yeast Extract, Preservative (Sodium Metabisulphite), Sweetener (Sodium Saccharin).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kim-Chi or Crunchy Red Cabbage?
Overall, Kim-Chi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kim-Chi has fewer calories: 15 kcal versus 29 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kim-Chi has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.