Kim-Chi vs Col troceada
Overall, Col troceada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kim-Chi | Col troceada |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 15 kcal | 16 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 2.6 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Col troceada has 54% less sugar (1.2 g vs 2.6 g).
- Col troceada has no salt, while Kim-Chi has 1.9 g.
- Col troceada has 33% more protein (0.9 g vs 0.6 g).
- Col troceada has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Col troceada lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Kim-Chi
Chinese cabbage, chill, garli,sat (RU) Kапуста по-корейски "Ким-чи"оригинал. Состав: китайская капуста, перец чеснок, соль, кориандр, консервант: сорбат калия. При температуре + 2"СдО -+/С фи ГОдноСТи до: СМ. обод. Koriander, Konservierungsstoff: Kaliumsorbat. Bei +2°C bis +7°C mindestens haltbar bis: siehe Rand. preferentemente antes del: ver margen. veja margem. (Hergestellt in
Col troceada
col (repollo), agua, sal y antioxidante: E-223. Contiene sulfitos.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kim-Chi or Col troceada?
Overall, Col troceada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kim-Chi has fewer calories: 15 kcal versus 16 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Col troceada has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 2.6 g per 100 g.