Pichelsteiner Eintopf mit Weißkohl und geräuchertem Bauchspeck vs Col troceada
Overall, Col troceada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Pichelsteiner Eintopf mit Weißkohl und geräuchertem Bauchspeck
Col troceada
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pichelsteiner Eintopf mit We... | Col troceada |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 43 kcal | 16 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | — |
| Sugars | 2.1 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 1.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Col troceada has 63% fewer calories (16 kcal vs 43 kcal).
- Col troceada has no fat, while Pichelsteiner Eintopf mit Weißkohl und geräuchertem Bauchspeck has 1.5 g.
- Col troceada has 43% less sugar (1.2 g vs 2.1 g).
- Col troceada has no salt, while Pichelsteiner Eintopf mit Weißkohl und geräuchertem Bauchspeck has 1 g.
- Col troceada has 33% more fiber (1.5 g vs 1 g).
- Pichelsteiner Eintopf mit Weißkohl und geräuchertem Bauchspeck has 47% more protein (1.7 g vs 0.9 g).
- Col troceada has the better Nutri-Score.
- Col troceada is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Col troceada lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Pichelsteiner Eintopf mit Weißkohl und geräuchertem Bauchspeck
Weißkohl 35%, Wasser, Kartoffeln 13,5%, Karotten 11%, Erbsen, Bauchspeck geräuchert 2% (Schweinebauch, Speisesalz, Dextrose, Gewürze, Stabilisator (Natriumnitrit), Rauch), Lauch, Schweinefleisch gewürzt gegart 1,5% (Schweinefleisch, Speisesalz, Stabilisator (Natriumnitrit)), Speisesalz, Rapsöl, Verdickungsmittel (Guarkernmehl), Gewürze, Aroma, Zucker
Col troceada
col (repollo), agua, sal y antioxidante: E-223. Contiene sulfitos.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pichelsteiner Eintopf mit Weißkohl und geräuchertem Bauchspeck or Col troceada?
Overall, Col troceada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Col troceada has fewer calories: 16 kcal versus 43 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Col troceada has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.