Col troceada vs Rode kool met appel
Overall, Col troceada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Col troceada | Rode kool met appel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 16 kcal | 42 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Col troceada has 62% fewer calories (16 kcal vs 42 kcal).
- Col troceada has 85% less sugar (1.2 g vs 8 g).
- Col troceada has no salt, while Rode kool met appel has 0.4 g.
- Col troceada has 100% more fiber (1.5 g vs 0 g).
- Col troceada is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Col troceada lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Col troceada
col (repollo), agua, sal y antioxidante: E-223. Contiene sulfitos.
Rode kool met appel
59% rode kool, water, 7% appel, suiker, azijn, gemodificeerd maïszetmeel, zout.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Col troceada or Rode kool met appel?
Overall, Col troceada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Col troceada has fewer calories: 16 kcal versus 42 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Col troceada has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 8 g per 100 g.