Pure de calabacin casa vs Rode kool met appel
Overall, Rode kool met appel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pure de calabacin casa | Rode kool met appel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 81 kcal | 42 kcal |
| Fat | 5.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 4.7 g | 8 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rode kool met appel has 48% fewer calories (42 kcal vs 81 kcal).
- Rode kool met appel has 98% less fat (0.1 g vs 5.4 g).
- Rode kool met appel has 92% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Pure de calabacin casa has 41% less sugar (4.7 g vs 8 g).
- Rode kool met appel has 73% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.5 g).
- Pure de calabacin casa has 47% more protein (1.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Rode kool met appel has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pure de calabacin casa
Melonenkürbisse 82.9% Möhren Sonnenblumenöl Tomatenmark Zwiebeln Salz, Zucker Sellerie Gewürze Konservierungsstoff E202
Rode kool met appel
59% rode kool, water, 7% appel, suiker, azijn, gemodificeerd maïszetmeel, zout.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pure de calabacin casa or Rode kool met appel?
Overall, Rode kool met appel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rode kool met appel has fewer calories: 42 kcal versus 81 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pure de calabacin casa has less sugar: 4.7 g versus 8 g per 100 g.