Surkål vs Rode kool met appel
Overall, Rode kool met appel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Surkål | Rode kool met appel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 45 kcal | 42 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 9.3 g | 8 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rode kool met appel has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Rode kool met appel has 14% less sugar (8 g vs 9.3 g).
- Rode kool met appel has 64% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.1 g).
- Rode kool met appel has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Surkål lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Surkål
strimlet hodekål 72 %, lake (vann, sukker, eddik, salt, konserveringsmiddel (natriumbenzoat), fortykningsmiddel (guarkjernemel), krydder), karve.
Rode kool met appel
59% rode kool, water, 7% appel, suiker, azijn, gemodificeerd maïszetmeel, zout.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Surkål or Rode kool met appel?
Overall, Rode kool met appel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rode kool met appel has fewer calories: 42 kcal versus 45 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rode kool met appel has less sugar: 8 g versus 9.3 g per 100 g.