Red cabbage vs Rode kool met appel
Overall, Rode kool met appel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Red cabbage | Rode kool met appel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 61 kcal | 42 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 13 g | 8 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rode kool met appel has 31% fewer calories (42 kcal vs 61 kcal).
- Rode kool met appel has 38% less sugar (8 g vs 13 g).
- Rode kool met appel has 71% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.4 g).
- Red cabbage has 100% more fiber (2.2 g vs 0 g).
- Rode kool met appel has the better Nutri-Score.
- Red cabbage is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Red cabbage
chou rouge 77,7%, sucre, eau, pommes, sel, vinaigre d'alcool, épices,
Rode kool met appel
59% rode kool, water, 7% appel, suiker, azijn, gemodificeerd maïszetmeel, zout.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Red cabbage or Rode kool met appel?
Overall, Rode kool met appel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rode kool met appel has fewer calories: 42 kcal versus 61 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rode kool met appel has less sugar: 8 g versus 13 g per 100 g.