Pure de calabacin casa vs Col troceada
Overall, Col troceada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pure de calabacin casa | Col troceada |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 81 kcal | 16 kcal |
| Fat | 5.4 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | — |
| Sugars | 4.7 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Col troceada has 80% fewer calories (16 kcal vs 81 kcal).
- Col troceada has no fat, while Pure de calabacin casa has 5.4 g.
- Col troceada has 74% less sugar (1.2 g vs 4.7 g).
- Col troceada has no salt, while Pure de calabacin casa has 1.5 g.
- Pure de calabacin casa has 40% more protein (1.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Col troceada has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Col troceada lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Pure de calabacin casa
Melonenkürbisse 82.9% Möhren Sonnenblumenöl Tomatenmark Zwiebeln Salz, Zucker Sellerie Gewürze Konservierungsstoff E202
Col troceada
col (repollo), agua, sal y antioxidante: E-223. Contiene sulfitos.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pure de calabacin casa or Col troceada?
Overall, Col troceada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Col troceada has fewer calories: 16 kcal versus 81 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Col troceada has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.