Kim-Chi vs Pure de calabacin casa
Overall, Kim-Chi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kim-Chi | Pure de calabacin casa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 15 kcal | 81 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 5.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 2.6 g | 4.7 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 1.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kim-Chi has 81% fewer calories (15 kcal vs 81 kcal).
- Kim-Chi has 98% less fat (0.1 g vs 5.4 g).
- Kim-Chi has no saturated fat, while Pure de calabacin casa has 0.7 g.
- Kim-Chi has 45% less sugar (2.6 g vs 4.7 g).
- Pure de calabacin casa has 22% less salt (1.5 g vs 1.9 g).
- Pure de calabacin casa has 60% more protein (1.5 g vs 0.6 g).
Ingredients
Kim-Chi
Chinese cabbage, chill, garli,sat (RU) Kапуста по-корейски "Ким-чи"оригинал. Состав: китайская капуста, перец чеснок, соль, кориандр, консервант: сорбат калия. При температуре + 2"СдО -+/С фи ГОдноСТи до: СМ. обод. Koriander, Konservierungsstoff: Kaliumsorbat. Bei +2°C bis +7°C mindestens haltbar bis: siehe Rand. preferentemente antes del: ver margen. veja margem. (Hergestellt in
Pure de calabacin casa
Melonenkürbisse 82.9% Möhren Sonnenblumenöl Tomatenmark Zwiebeln Salz, Zucker Sellerie Gewürze Konservierungsstoff E202
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kim-Chi or Pure de calabacin casa?
Overall, Kim-Chi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kim-Chi has fewer calories: 15 kcal versus 81 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kim-Chi has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.