Comparison

Khatta meetha 200g vs Munchy masala

Overall, Munchy masala has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKhatta meetha 200gMunchy masala
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 530 kcal 468 kcal
Fat 29.3 g 17.7 g
Saturated fat 12.5 g 4.3 g
Sugars 13.1 g 2.2 g
Salt 0.7 g 2 g
Fiber 1.3 g 3.2 g
Protein 9.3 g 5.5 g
Additives30
AllergensPeanutsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Munchy masala has 12% fewer calories (468 kcal vs 530 kcal).
  • Munchy masala has 39% less fat (17.7 g vs 29.3 g).
  • Munchy masala has 66% less saturated fat (4.3 g vs 12.5 g).
  • Munchy masala has 83% less sugar (2.2 g vs 13.1 g).
  • Khatta meetha 200g has 68% less salt (0.7 g vs 2 g).
  • Munchy masala has 60% more fiber (3.2 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Khatta meetha 200g has 41% more protein (9.3 g vs 5.5 g).
  • Munchy masala has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Khatta meetha 200g lists: Peanuts.

Ingredients

Khatta meetha 200g

Edible Vegetable Oil (Palmolein, Cotton Seed, Corn, Sunflower, C-31, SECTOR-62, NOIDA-20 Rice Bran), Rice Flakes (22%), Bengal Gram Flour (Besan) (21%), Refined Sugar, Split Pulse Bengal Gram (Chana Dal) (7%), Groundnuts (Peanuts) (5%), Sago (4%), Red Lentils (Masur Whole) (2.5%), Green Peas, Tapioca Starch, Iodised Salt, Black Salt, Turmeric, Acidity Regulator (INS 330), Red Chilli, Ajwain, Raising Agent (INS 500 ii) & Asafoetida.

Munchy masala

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Khatta meetha 200g or Munchy masala?

Overall, Munchy masala has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Munchy masala has fewer calories: 468 kcal versus 530 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Munchy masala has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 13.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons