Bingo! Mad Angles Achaari Masti vs Munchy masala
Overall, Munchy masala has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bingo! Mad Angles Achaari Ma... | Munchy masala |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 526 kcal | 468 kcal |
| Fat | 29.5 g | 17.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 13.8 g | 4.3 g |
| Sugars | 6 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.2 g |
| Protein | 5.6 g | 5.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Munchy masala has 11% fewer calories (468 kcal vs 526 kcal).
- Munchy masala has 40% less fat (17.7 g vs 29.5 g).
- Munchy masala has 69% less saturated fat (4.3 g vs 13.8 g).
- Munchy masala has 63% less sugar (2.2 g vs 6 g).
- Munchy masala has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Bingo! Mad Angles Achaari Masti lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Bingo! Mad Angles Achaari Masti
RICE GRITS, SEASONING {REFINED PALMOLEIN, SUGAR, SPICES AND CONDIMENTS, IODIZED SALT, NATURE IDENTICAL FLAVOURING SUBSTANCES, HYDROLYZED VEGETABLE PROTEIN AND NATURAL FLAVOURS AND NATURAL FLAVOURING SUBSTANCES), REFINED PALMOLEIN, DEGERMED CORN GRITS AND BENGAL GRAM GRITS. "USED AS FLAVOURING AGENTS.
Munchy masala
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bingo! Mad Angles Achaari Masti or Munchy masala?
Overall, Munchy masala has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Munchy masala has fewer calories: 468 kcal versus 526 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Munchy masala has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 6 g per 100 g.