Kurkure vs Bingo! Mad Angles Achaari Masti
Overall, Kurkure has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kurkure | Bingo! Mad Angles Achaari Ma... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 557 kcal | 526 kcal |
| Fat | 33.7 g | 29.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.7 g | 13.8 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 6 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 6 g | 5.6 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bingo! Mad Angles Achaari Masti has 12% less fat (29.5 g vs 33.7 g).
- Kurkure has 44% less saturated fat (7.7 g vs 13.8 g).
- Kurkure has 63% less sugar (2.2 g vs 6 g).
- Only Bingo! Mad Angles Achaari Masti lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Kurkure
Cereal Products (66%) (Rice Meal (43.5%), Corn Meal (23%)), Edible Vegetable Oil (Palmolein),*Seasoning (~Spices and Condiments, lodised Salt, Sugar, Flavour (Natural and Nature Identical Flavouring Substances), Black Salt, Tomato Powder, Acidity Regulators (330, 296, 334), Colour(160c), Maltodextrin) , Gram Meal (0.5%).
Bingo! Mad Angles Achaari Masti
RICE GRITS, SEASONING {REFINED PALMOLEIN, SUGAR, SPICES AND CONDIMENTS, IODIZED SALT, NATURE IDENTICAL FLAVOURING SUBSTANCES, HYDROLYZED VEGETABLE PROTEIN AND NATURAL FLAVOURS AND NATURAL FLAVOURING SUBSTANCES), REFINED PALMOLEIN, DEGERMED CORN GRITS AND BENGAL GRAM GRITS. "USED AS FLAVOURING AGENTS.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kurkure or Bingo! Mad Angles Achaari Masti?
Overall, Kurkure has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bingo! Mad Angles Achaari Masti has fewer calories: 526 kcal versus 557 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kurkure has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 6 g per 100 g.