Jumbo Kalamata Olives with Oak Smoked Oil vs Kalamata Olives
Overall, Kalamata Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Jumbo Kalamata Olives with Oak Smoked Oil
Kalamata Olives
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Jumbo Kalamata Olives with O... | Kalamata Olives |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 224 kcal | 233 kcal |
| Fat | 23.1 g | 14.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.7 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.6 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 6.7 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 6.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kalamata Olives has 36% less fat (14.7 g vs 23.1 g).
- Kalamata Olives has 26% less saturated fat (2 g vs 2.7 g).
- Kalamata Olives has no sugar, while Jumbo Kalamata Olives with Oak Smoked Oil has 0.5 g.
- Kalamata Olives has 26% less salt (1.9 g vs 2.6 g).
- Kalamata Olives has 75% more fiber (6.7 g vs 1.7 g).
- Kalamata Olives has 78% more protein (6.7 g vs 1.5 g).
- Kalamata Olives has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Jumbo Kalamata Olives with Oak Smoked Oil
Kalamata Olives (98%) (Kalamata Olives, Salt), Smoked Vegetable Oil (1%) (Sunflower, Rapeseed), Vegetable Oil (Sunflower, Rapeseed).
Kalamata Olives
Fermented and pasterized pitted kalmatta olive variety, water, sea salt, red wine vinegar, tassos extra virgin olive oil, herbs.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Jumbo Kalamata Olives with Oak Smoked Oil or Kalamata Olives?
Overall, Kalamata Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Jumbo Kalamata Olives with Oak Smoked Oil has fewer calories: 224 kcal versus 233 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kalamata Olives has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.