Kalamata Olives vs Olives à la grecque
Overall, Kalamata Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kalamata Olives | Olives à la grecque |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 233 kcal | 258 kcal |
| Fat | 14.7 g | 27.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 3.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 18.3 g |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kalamata Olives has 47% less fat (14.7 g vs 27.7 g).
- Kalamata Olives has 42% less saturated fat (2 g vs 3.4 g).
- Kalamata Olives has 90% less salt (1.9 g vs 18.3 g).
- Kalamata Olives has 56% more fiber (6.7 g vs 2.9 g).
- Kalamata Olives has 85% more protein (6.7 g vs 1 g).
- Kalamata Olives has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kalamata Olives
Fermented and pasterized pitted kalmatta olive variety, water, sea salt, red wine vinegar, tassos extra virgin olive oil, herbs.
Olives à la grecque
Olives, sel, huile de tournesol.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kalamata Olives or Olives à la grecque?
Overall, Kalamata Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kalamata Olives has fewer calories: 233 kcal versus 258 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kalamata Olives has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.