Kalamata Olives vs Oliven a la Grecque schwarz mit Stein
Overall, Kalamata Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kalamata Olives | Oliven a la Grecque schwarz... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 233 kcal | 357 kcal |
| Fat | 14.7 g | 34 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 6.1 g |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | — |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 1.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kalamata Olives has 35% fewer calories (233 kcal vs 357 kcal).
- Kalamata Olives has 57% less fat (14.7 g vs 34 g).
- Kalamata Olives has 33% less saturated fat (2 g vs 3 g).
- Kalamata Olives has 69% less salt (1.9 g vs 6.1 g).
- Kalamata Olives has 78% more protein (6.7 g vs 1.5 g).
- Kalamata Olives has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kalamata Olives
Fermented and pasterized pitted kalmatta olive variety, water, sea salt, red wine vinegar, tassos extra virgin olive oil, herbs.
Oliven a la Grecque schwarz mit Stein
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kalamata Olives or Oliven a la Grecque schwarz mit Stein?
Overall, Kalamata Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kalamata Olives has fewer calories: 233 kcal versus 357 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kalamata Olives has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.