Comparison

Kalamata Olives vs Olives noires à la grecque

Overall, Kalamata Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKalamata OlivesOlives noires à la grecque
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 233 kcal 318 kcal
Fat 14.7 g 24.8 g
Saturated fat 2 g 7.5 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 1.9 g 9.4 g
Fiber 6.7 g 6.2 g
Protein 6.7 g 1.1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kalamata Olives has 27% fewer calories (233 kcal vs 318 kcal).
  • Kalamata Olives has 41% less fat (14.7 g vs 24.8 g).
  • Kalamata Olives has 73% less saturated fat (2 g vs 7.5 g).
  • Kalamata Olives has 80% less salt (1.9 g vs 9.4 g).
  • Kalamata Olives has 84% more protein (6.7 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Kalamata Olives has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Kalamata Olives

Fermented and pasterized pitted kalmatta olive variety, water, sea salt, red wine vinegar, tassos extra virgin olive oil, herbs.

Olives noires à la grecque

olive, sel, huile végétale.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kalamata Olives or Olives noires à la grecque?

Overall, Kalamata Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kalamata Olives has fewer calories: 233 kcal versus 318 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kalamata Olives has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons