Comparison

Kalamata Olives vs Olive Taggiasche denocciolate in olio extra vergine di oliva

Overall, Kalamata Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKalamata OlivesOlive Taggiasche denocciolat...
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 233 kcal 255 kcal
Fat 14.7 g 26.6 g
Saturated fat 2 g 3.8 g
Sugars 0 g 1 g
Salt 1.9 g 3.8 g
Fiber 6.7 g —
Protein 6.7 g 1.7 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kalamata Olives has 45% less fat (14.7 g vs 26.6 g).
  • Kalamata Olives has 47% less saturated fat (2 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Kalamata Olives has no sugar, while Olive Taggiasche denocciolate in olio extra vergine di oliva has 1 g.
  • Kalamata Olives has 49% less salt (1.9 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Kalamata Olives has 75% more protein (6.7 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Kalamata Olives has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Kalamata Olives is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Kalamata Olives

Fermented and pasterized pitted kalmatta olive variety, water, sea salt, red wine vinegar, tassos extra virgin olive oil, herbs.

Olive Taggiasche denocciolate in olio extra vergine di oliva

Olive taggiasche 61%, olio extra vergine di oliva 36%, aromi naturali, sale, correttore di acidità: acido citrico.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kalamata Olives or Olive Taggiasche denocciolate in olio extra vergine di oliva?

Overall, Kalamata Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kalamata Olives has fewer calories: 233 kcal versus 255 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kalamata Olives has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons