Comparison

Japanese Curry Mix In Block vs Tikka masala curry paste

Overall, Tikka masala curry paste has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientJapanese Curry Mix In BlockTikka masala curry paste
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 478 kcal 220 kcal
Fat 29 g 16.9 g
Saturated fat 17 g 1.7 g
Sugars 8.4 g 6.2 g
Salt 11.1 g 5.4 g
Fiber 3.1 g 4.8 g
Protein 6.5 g 2.5 g
Additives50
AllergensCelery, Gluten, MustardNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tikka masala curry paste has 54% fewer calories (220 kcal vs 478 kcal).
  • Tikka masala curry paste has 42% less fat (16.9 g vs 29 g).
  • Tikka masala curry paste has 90% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 17 g).
  • Tikka masala curry paste has 26% less sugar (6.2 g vs 8.4 g).
  • Tikka masala curry paste has 51% less salt (5.4 g vs 11.1 g).
  • Tikka masala curry paste has 35% more fiber (4.8 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Japanese Curry Mix In Block has 62% more protein (6.5 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Only Japanese Curry Mix In Block lists: Celery, Gluten, Mustard.

Ingredients

Japanese Curry Mix In Block

wheat flour, vegetable oils (palm oil, rapeseed oil), sugar, salt, curry powder 7,7% (turmeric, coriander, cumin, fenugreek, orange peel, spices), flavour enhancers: e621, e627, e631, colour: e150a, spices (pepper, garlic, celery seed), malic acid

Tikka masala curry paste

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Japanese Curry Mix In Block or Tikka masala curry paste?

Overall, Tikka masala curry paste has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tikka masala curry paste has fewer calories: 220 kcal versus 478 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tikka masala curry paste has less sugar: 6.2 g versus 8.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons