Comparison

High Protein Supersnack vs Natto

Overall, Natto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHigh Protein SupersnackNatto
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 400 kcal 198 kcal
Fat 19.2 g 8.8 g
Saturated fat 3.9 g 1.3 g
Sugars 3.9 g 3.2 g
Salt 2 g 0 g
Fiber 19.2 g —
Protein 46.2 g 16.2 g
Additives00
AllergensSoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Natto has 51% fewer calories (198 kcal vs 400 kcal).
  • Natto has 54% less fat (8.8 g vs 19.2 g).
  • Natto has 66% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Natto has 17% less sugar (3.2 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Natto has no salt, while High Protein Supersnack has 2 g.
  • High Protein Supersnack has 65% more protein (46.2 g vs 16.2 g).
  • Natto has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only High Protein Supersnack lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

High Protein Supersnack

Edamame (Soybean), Sea Salt, Soybean Oil

Natto

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: High Protein Supersnack or Natto?

Overall, Natto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Natto has fewer calories: 198 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Natto has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons