High Protein Supersnack vs Natto
Overall, Natto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | High Protein Supersnack | Natto |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 400 kcal | 198 kcal |
| Fat | 19.2 g | 8.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.9 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 3.9 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 19.2 g | — |
| Protein | 46.2 g | 16.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Natto has 51% fewer calories (198 kcal vs 400 kcal).
- Natto has 54% less fat (8.8 g vs 19.2 g).
- Natto has 66% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 3.9 g).
- Natto has 17% less sugar (3.2 g vs 3.9 g).
- Natto has no salt, while High Protein Supersnack has 2 g.
- High Protein Supersnack has 65% more protein (46.2 g vs 16.2 g).
- Natto has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only High Protein Supersnack lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
High Protein Supersnack
Edamame (Soybean), Sea Salt, Soybean Oil
Natto
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: High Protein Supersnack or Natto?
Overall, Natto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Natto has fewer calories: 198 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Natto has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.