Comparison

High Protein Supersnack vs Crispies X Teddy

Overall, High Protein Supersnack has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHigh Protein SupersnackCrispies X Teddy
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 400 kcal 362 kcal
Fat 19.2 g 1.9 g
Saturated fat 3.9 g 0.4 g
Sugars 3.9 g 9.1 g
Salt 2 g 2.7 g
Fiber 19.2 g 1.8 g
Protein 46.2 g 58 g
Additives00
AllergensSoybeansGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Crispies X Teddy has 90% less fat (1.9 g vs 19.2 g).
  • Crispies X Teddy has 90% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 3.9 g).
  • High Protein Supersnack has 58% less sugar (3.9 g vs 9.1 g).
  • High Protein Supersnack has 26% less salt (2 g vs 2.7 g).
  • High Protein Supersnack has 91% more fiber (19.2 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Crispies X Teddy has 20% more protein (58 g vs 46.2 g).
  • High Protein Supersnack has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only High Protein Supersnack lists: Soybeans.
  • Only Crispies X Teddy lists: Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

High Protein Supersnack

Edamame (Soybean), Sea Salt, Soybean Oil

Crispies X Teddy

KING.Me Ro поко Crispies protéinées au Cacao FR CRISPIES PROTÉINS DE SOJA 59% AVEC CACAO. ingrédients: 74% PROTEINES DE SOJA, semoule de riz, sucre, 4% poudre de cacao (faible en gras), FARINE SOJA, sel, arôme naturel. Peut contenir des GLUTEN, CEUFS, LAIT (LACTOSE), FRUITS A COQUE et GRAINES DE SÉSAME.

FAQ

Which is healthier: High Protein Supersnack or Crispies X Teddy?

Overall, High Protein Supersnack has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Crispies X Teddy has fewer calories: 362 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

High Protein Supersnack has less sugar: 3.9 g versus 9.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons