Comparison
Hareng vs Hareng
Overall, Hareng has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hareng | Hareng |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 359 kcal | 160 kcal |
| Fat | 32 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 3.1 g |
| Sugars | 9 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 6.6 g | 9.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hareng has 55% fewer calories (160 kcal vs 359 kcal).
- Hareng has 59% less fat (13 g vs 32 g).
- Hareng has 18% less saturated fat (3.1 g vs 3.8 g).
- Hareng has 94% less sugar (0.5 g vs 9 g).
- Hareng has 40% less salt (1.8 g vs 3 g).
- Hareng has 33% more protein (9.9 g vs 6.6 g).
Ingredients
Hareng
Not available.
Hareng
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hareng or Hareng?
Overall, Hareng has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hareng has fewer calories: 160 kcal versus 359 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hareng has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 9 g per 100 g.