Halloumi fries vs Pita
Overall, Pita has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Halloumi fries | Pita |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 317 kcal | 265 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.6 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 8.8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 3 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | Gluten, Sesame seeds |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pita has 16% fewer calories (265 kcal vs 317 kcal).
- Pita has 93% less fat (1.5 g vs 21 g).
- Pita has no saturated fat, while Halloumi fries has 9.6 g.
- Pita has 67% less salt (0.7 g vs 2.1 g).
- Halloumi fries has 41% more protein (15 g vs 8.8 g).
- Pita has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Halloumi fries lists: Milk.
- Only Pita lists: Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Halloumi fries
Halloumi Käse (mindestens 43 % Fett i. Tr.) 65 % (Kuhmilch, Schafsmilch, Ziegenmilch, Speisesalz, mikrobieller Labaustauschstoff, Minze), Wasser, Weizenmehl, Maisstärke, Sonnenblumenöl, Verdickungsmittel: Methylcellulose, Buttermilch, Gewürze. Kann Spuren von Eiern, Soja, Fisch, Schalenfrüchten, Krebstieren, Weichtieren und Sellerie enthalten.
Pita
ENRICHED FLOUR (WHEAT FLOUR, MALTED BARLEY FLOUR, NIACIN, REDUCED IRON, THIAMINE MONONITRATE, RIBOFLAVIN, FOLIC ACID), WATER, SUGAR, SALT, YEAST, OAT FIBER, CALCIUM PROPIONATE, MONOGLYCERIDES, ASCORBIC ACID, CITRIC ACID, GUAR GUM, ENZYMES, SESAME.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Halloumi fries or Pita?
Overall, Pita has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pita has fewer calories: 265 kcal versus 317 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Halloumi fries has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.