Comparison

Halloumi fries vs Halloumi fries

Overall, Halloumi fries has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHalloumi friesHalloumi fries
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 317 kcal 275 kcal
Fat 21 g 15 g
Saturated fat 9.6 g 6.5 g
Sugars 1.2 g 1.5 g
Salt 2.1 g 1.9 g
Fiber — 1.9 g
Protein 15 g 14 g
Additives18
AllergensGluten, MilkGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Halloumi fries has 13% fewer calories (275 kcal vs 317 kcal).
  • Halloumi fries has 29% less fat (15 g vs 21 g).
  • Halloumi fries has 32% less saturated fat (6.5 g vs 9.6 g).
  • Halloumi fries has 20% less sugar (1.2 g vs 1.5 g).

Ingredients

Halloumi fries

Halloumi Käse (mindestens 43 % Fett i. Tr.) 65 % (Kuhmilch, Schafsmilch, Ziegenmilch, Speisesalz, mikrobieller Labaustauschstoff, Minze), Wasser, Weizenmehl, Maisstärke, Sonnenblumenöl, Verdickungsmittel: Methylcellulose, Buttermilch, Gewürze. Kann Spuren von Eiern, Soja, Fisch, Schalenfrüchten, Krebstieren, Weichtieren und Sellerie enthalten.

Halloumi fries

fromage 56% (LAIT DE VACHE [Chypre], LAIT DE BREBIS [Chypre], LAIT DE CHÈVRE [Chypre], sel de cuisine, menthe), FARINE DE BLÉ, eau,huile de tournesol, fécule de pomme de terre modifiée (E 1442), épaississants (E 461, E 415), dextrine de pomme de terre, poudres àlever (E 450, E341, E 501), levure, sel de cuisine, glucose, amidons (pomme de terre, manioc), colorant (E 160c), épices.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Halloumi fries or Halloumi fries?

Overall, Halloumi fries has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Halloumi fries has fewer calories: 275 kcal versus 317 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Halloumi fries has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons