Gratin duo de choux vs Gratin de courgettes
Overall, Gratin duo de choux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gratin duo de choux | Gratin de courgettes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 81 kcal | 136 kcal |
| Fat | 4.9 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.3 g | 7.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 2.7 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 4.1 g | 3.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Eggs, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gratin duo de choux has 40% fewer calories (81 kcal vs 136 kcal).
- Gratin duo de choux has 55% less fat (4.9 g vs 11 g).
- Gratin duo de choux has 57% less saturated fat (3.3 g vs 7.6 g).
- Gratin duo de choux has 81% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.7 g).
- Gratin duo de choux has 70% more fiber (2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Gratin duo de choux has 22% more protein (4.1 g vs 3.2 g).
- Gratin duo de choux is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Gratin de courgettes lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Gratin duo de choux
Chou-fleur* 30,7%, brocoli* 25,2%, eau, emmental français râpé* 6,8% (contient lait), crème fraîche pasteurisée* 4,3% (lait), oignon*, lait entier en poudre*, amidon de riz*, fécule de manioc*, beurre* (lait), sel.
Gratin de courgettes
Courgettes 43%, crème, lait demi-écrémé, fromage, ceufs, amidons modifiés de maïs et de pommes de terre, sel, ail, muscade, poivre.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gratin duo de choux or Gratin de courgettes?
Overall, Gratin duo de choux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gratin duo de choux has fewer calories: 81 kcal versus 136 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gratin duo de choux has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.