Gouda Holland jung vs Gouda gerieben
Overall, Gouda gerieben has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gouda Holland jung | Gouda gerieben |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 365 kcal | 360 kcal |
| Fat | 31 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 18.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gouda gerieben has 13% less fat (27 g vs 31 g).
- Gouda gerieben has 11% less saturated fat (18.6 g vs 21 g).
Ingredients
Gouda Holland jung
Pasteurisierte Kuhmilch, Salz, Käsereikulturen, mikrobieller Labaustauschstoff, Konservierungsstoff: Natamycin
Gouda gerieben
Gouda (pasteurisierte Kuhmilch, Speisesalz, Säuerungskulturen, mikrobielles Lab), Stärke
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gouda Holland jung or Gouda gerieben?
Overall, Gouda gerieben has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gouda gerieben has fewer calories: 360 kcal versus 365 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gouda Holland jung has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.